The method that could promise success would be determined by the nature of the child’s act. Had the child acted intentionally, or out of negligence?
The victim of a child’s intentional act has the right to sue the parents.
If you have been victimized by such an act, get details on your state’s laws, before you look forward to winning a large amount of money. Some states put a cap on the size of the award that a victim can receive from the parents of a son or daughter that has been held liable for damages to another person, as per personal injury lawyer in Edmonton.
How does a court measure the degree of negligence in the behavior of a youngster?
That behavior is measured against the actions of someone of a similar age, along with a similar experience, capacity and stage of development. In other words, that behavior would not be compared to the actions of an adult. Of course, if a victim were to charge the parents with negligence for failing to control their son or daughter, then their behavior could be compared to a reasonable action from an adult.
When does the legal system demand the behavior of an adult from an older youth?
Not every state has the same rules, with respect to a youth’s ability to refrain from careless and negligent behaviors. In some states, any youth that has taken part in an adult activity can be held responsible for maintaining the same standards that apply to adults. A youth’s failure to maintain those standards, while taking part in the chosen/adult activity could be grounds for charging the same young person with negligence.
In such states, a careless and negligent young person could face punishment from both the legal system and from his/her parents. If the court had held the parents liable for damages that had been caused by a son or daughter, the same son or daughter might need to help with making those payments. Of course, the parents could add any other financial or other punishment that seemed appropriate.
It would be interesting to learn the terms in the insurance policies that are sold to car owners in those states that have such a rule. What are the consequences for a parent, if a younger driver/child has stolen the keys to the car, and has also become involved in an accident?
Does the insurance company hit the same parent with a punishment, in addition to the one demanded by the courts? Does the insurance company try to coordinate any of its price increases with the demands that could be coming from the court system? If so, how does it go about working toward that specific end?