The law establishes that any person who causes harm to another must answer for the harm they caused. Therefore, it is essential to identify the culprit in order to receive compensation. Hence the question, how do lawyers identify who is at fault in a personal injury accident?
HIRE A GOOD PERSONAL LAWYER FIRM
Sometimes the culprit is evident. For example: If a man under the influence of alcohol runs the traffic lights and collides with another vehicle, he is clearly the culprit.
However, there are other situations in which the culprit cannot be immediately determined. As a result, the victim needs to hire an experienced professional who can identify him.
Personal injury lawyers in Sherwood Park are qualified to identify the aggressor. Why? Because they have the knowledge, the means, and the skills.
THE LAW FIRM WILL DETERMINE WHO IS AT FAULT
The lawyers’ knowledge helps them identify the culprit. Because of their knowledge of the law, they can clearly see what is right and what is wrong, and they know that justice and evil are as different as water and oil.
Victims generally consider an attorney’s knowledge and experience as the only important factor, but most of the time they ignore the attorney’s means. That is their team of experts who help them identify the culprit.
For example, lawyers are not experts in road design. Therefore, they should have a road specialist on their team to help them identify the aggressor in accidents like this.
The same happens when the accident was allegedly caused by some chemical or drug. Because they are not experts; one of the doctors in their team helps them identify the cause of the accident.
Lastly, the skills of attorneys are a useful tool in a personal injury case. Their investigative expertise is similar to that of a policeman; they investigate the facts and the people involved to clearly identify a culprit and achieve justice.
FACTORS THAT ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING WHO IS AT FAULT
INVOLVEMENT IN THE ACCIDENT
The law considers a person to be involved in an accident when they are present during the events, and participate actively in them. Involvement in the accident is one of the factors used to determine the culprit.
For example, a group of young people was gathered together, when suddenly, the strongest of the group assaulted the weakest. During the incident, the bully tells the rest of the youth to join him and beat the boy as well.
If the other youths hit the victim, they would be guilty of his injuries. But, if they abstain from doing it, they would not be considered liable because they did not get involved in the events.
LIABILITY IN THE ACCIDENT
A person can be found liable for an accident if he or she failed to do his or her duty and this resulted in others being harmed, even if it wasn’t his or her original purpose.
The most classic example of this would be a store owner who failed to keep her property in good condition. If an accident occurred inside that store, she would have to answer for the damages. Even if it was not her intention to cause harm, she would still be liable for the resulting injuries.